PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 20, 2004
Directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make specified corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 4818 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005).
People & committees
Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 381 - 0 (Roll No. 543). (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10899)
House roll call 543 · Individual votesResolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 381 - 0 (Roll No. 543).(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10899)
House roll call 543 · Individual votesPOSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate,the Chair put the question on adoption of the motion and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Obey demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the motion until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 528.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10899-10906, H10918)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11767)
Received in the Senate.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 866, H. Con. Res. 528 is considered passed House. (text as passed House: CR H10097-10098)
Passed/agreed to in House: Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 866, H. Con. Res. 528 is considered passed House.(text as passed House: CR H10097-10098)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.528 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.528 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.528 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.528 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.