PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and an amended preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S8962)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 30, 1995
Urges the executive branch to: (1) reiterate to the claimants in the South China Sea that the United States does not take a position on any individual claim; and (2) declare the active support of the United States for the 1992 Manila Declaration of the Association of South East Asian Nations. Calls upon all the claimants: (1) to observe the Declaration's provisions; (2) refrain from using military force to assert or expand territorial claims in the South China Sea; and (3) scrupulously observe the January 1995 status quo ante pending any negotiations or resolution of the conflicts between such claimants over such claims.
People & committees
Sen. Thomas, Craig [R-WY] · R–WY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and an amended preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S8962)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and an amended preamble by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S8962)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 129.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms with amendments and an amended preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms with amendments and an amended preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4932-4934)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.97 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.97 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.97 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.97 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.