PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.71 / 103rd Congress

Omnibus Committee Funding Resolution for 1993 and 1994

Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 94-2. Record Vote No: 20.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Feb 25, 1993

Omnibus Committee Funding Resolution for 1993 and 1994 - Authorizes expenditures by the Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress and the following Senate committees from March 1, 1993, through September 30, 1994, and for the period March 1, 1994, through February 28, 1995: (1) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; (2) Appropriations; (3) Armed Services; (4) Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; (5) Budget; (6) Commerce, Science, and Transportation; (7) Energy and Natural Resources; (8) Environment and Public Works; (9) Finance; (10) Foreign Relations; (11) Governmental Affairs; (12) Judiciary; (13) Labor and Human Resources; (14) Rules and Administration; (15) Small Business; (16) Veterans' Affairs; (17) Aging; (18) Intelligence; and (19) Indian Affairs. Authorizes the transfer of any unexpended balance of any committee for the period ending February 28, 1993, to a special reserve for such committee. Earmarks a specified amount to be available for each Committee. Expresses the sense of the Senate that the salary of Senators should be frozen for one year. Redesignates the Select Committee on Indian Affairs as the Committee on Indian Affairs. Prohibits a Senate committee from carrying over an unexpended balance beyond March 1, 1995.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Ford, Wendell H. [D-KY] · D–KY

Committees

  • Rules and Administration Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 94-2. Record Vote No: 20.

      Senate roll call 20 · Individual votes
    2. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 94-2. Record Vote No: 20.

      Senate roll call 20 · Individual votes
    3. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2067, S2069-2077, S2080-2081)

    4. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S1956-1959, S1961-1983)

    5. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 5.

    6. Committee on Rules. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Ford. With written report No. 103-5.

    7. Committee on Rules. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Ford. With written report No. 103-5.

    8. Committee on Rules ordered to be reported an original measure in lieu of S.Res.39, S.Res.40, S.Res.41, S.Res.43, S.Res.44, S.Res. 45, S.Res.46, S.Res.47, S.Res.48, S.Res.49, S.Res.50, S.Res.51, S.Res.52, S.Res.53, S.Res.55, S.Res.56, S.Res.57, S.Res.58, S.Res.59, S.Res.65.

    9. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.Res.71 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.Res.71 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.Res.71 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.Res.71 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources