A resolution to amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that a financial impact statement be included in the report accompanying each bill or joint resolution reported by any committee (except those by the Committee on Appropriations), showing the financial impact that any Federal mandates in the bill or joint resolution would have on States and local governments.
Referred to the Committee on Rules.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 16, 1993
Amends rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate to require each report accompanying a bill or joint resolution reported by a committee (except the Committee on Appropriations) to contain: (1) an evaluation of the financial impact that Federal mandates in the bill or resolution would have on State and local governments; or (2) in lieu of such evaluation, a statement of the reasons why compliance with such requirement is impracticable.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Res.69 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Res.69 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Res.69 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Res.69 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.