PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8107-8108; text as passed Senate: CR S8107-8108; text of measure as introduced: CR S8065)
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Nov 18, 2010
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Supports the development of a democratic political system and free market economy in Moldova and a November 2010 parliamentary election process that comports with international standards.
Recognizes that the government of Moldova's commitment to economic and political reforms since 2009 has resulted in progress towards integration into European institutions.
Acknowledges that continued reform and commitment to a free election process will remain necessary for Moldova's full integration into the Western community of nations.
Notes that continued reforms in Moldova could provide for an additional basis for the repeal of the Jackson-Vanik trade restrictions.
Encourages ongoing negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Moldova concerning visa liberalization and an Association Agreement.
People & committees
Sen. Kerry, John F. [D-MA] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8107-8108; text as passed Senate: CR S8107-8108; text of measure as introduced: CR S8065)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8107-8108; text as passed Senate: CR S8107-8108; text of measure as introduced: CR S8065)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 10, 2023. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.683 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.683 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.683 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.683 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.