PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.68 / 106th Congress

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the treatment of women and girls by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 17, 1999

Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) the President should instruct the U.S. representative to the United Nations (UN) to use all appropriate means to prevent the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan from obtaining the seat in the UN General Assembly reserved for Afghanistan as long as gross violations of internationally recognized human rights against women and girls persist; and (2) the United States should refuse to recognize any such government which is not taking actions to achieve specified goals in Afghanistan, including the effective participation of women in all civil, economic, and social life, the right of women and girls to an education without discrimination, and equal access of women and girls to health facilities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA] · D–CA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  2. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  3. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S4818-4819)

  4. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  5. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 75.

  6. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms without amendment. Without written report.

  7. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms without amendment. Without written report.

  8. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2974)

  9. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  10. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.68 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.68 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.68 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.68 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources