A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Committee on Rules and Administration. Hearings held.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 14, 2010

Declares that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the rules of previous Senates and should, upon a motion by a Senator to bring debate to a close, if said motion receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the Senators, proceed to determine the Rules of its Proceedings in accordance with the Constitution.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Udall, Tom [D-NM] · D–NM

Committees

Rules and Administration Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 22, 2010
Committee on Rules and Administration. Hearings held.
Sep 14, 2010
Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. (text of measure as introduced: CR S7094)
Sep 14, 2010
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Sep 14, 2010 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.619 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.619, 111th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-resolution/619

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2010-09-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/sres619/BILLS-111sres619is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:36:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Res.619 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.619 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.619, 111th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-resolution/619

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2010-09-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/sres619/BILLS-111sres619is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:36:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.619 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.619 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.619, 111th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-resolution/619

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2010-09-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/sres619/BILLS-111sres619is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:36:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.619 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.619 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.619, 111th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-resolution/619

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2010-09-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/sres619/BILLS-111sres619is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:36:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.619 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.