PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1981; text as passed Senate: CR S1981)
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Feb 14, 2007
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Amends Senate Resolution 400 (94th Congress) (establishing the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence) to make technical amendments relating to: (1) the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the CIA Director; (2) the Select Committee on Ethics; (3) the Intelligence Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); and (4) references to Senate Rules.
People & committees
Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV] · D–WV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1981; text as passed Senate: CR S1981)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S1981; text as passed Senate: CR S1981)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 16. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1354)
Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. With written report No. 110-3.
Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. With written report No. 110-3.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.50 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.50 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.50 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.50 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.