PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S1129)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 25, 2010
Recognizes the progress made by the people of Ukraine in establishing democratic institutions and carrying out elections on January 17, 2010, and on February 7, 2010.
Encourages all parties to respect Ukraine's independence and territorial sovereignty as well as its integration into the international democratic community.
Pledges support for the development of a free democratic system and a free market economy in Ukraine.
Reaffirms the Senate's commitment to engage the government of Ukraine in further development of bilateral cooperation through the United States-Ukraine Strategic Partnership Commission.
People & committees
Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN] · R–IN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S1129)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S1129)
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1128-1129)
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S1128-1129)
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S800)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S800)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.422 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.422 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.422 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.422 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.