PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S204)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 22, 2010
Recognizes the 150th anniversary of the founding of the Colorado National Guard (Guard) and its exemplary service to the state of Colorado and the nation.
Thanks Guard members and their families for their service and sacrifice on behalf of Colorado and the nation.
Pledges continued support in providing the Guard with the resources necessary to perform state and federal missions.
Expresses condolences to the families of those Guard members who made the ultimate sacrifice while serving in the Guard.
Honors the dedication of Guard members who play a central role in protecting the United States and the freedoms and liberties of its citizens.
People & committees
Sen. Udall, Mark [D-CO] · D–CO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S204)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S204)
Senate Committee on Armed Services discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S203-204)
Senate Committee on Armed Services discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S203-204)
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text of measure as introduced: CR S155-156)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.395 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.395 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.395 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.395 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.