PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 12, 2000
Calls upon the Government of Bolivia to continue its successful program of coca eradication toward the total eradication of illegal coca in Bolivia by the end of 2002.Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) the United States should fully support the democratically elected Government of Bolivia; (2) the release of emergency supplemental assistance already approved by the United States for sustainable development activities in Bolivia should be accelerated; (3) the President, on a priority basis, should look for additional ways to provide increased tangible support to the people and Government of Bolivia; (4) such Government should continue to respect the human rights of all of its citizens and continue to discuss legitimate concerns of Bolivia's rural population; and (5) indigenous leaders should enter into discussions with the Government on issues of concern and cease provocative acts that could lead to escalating violence.
People & committees
Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN] · R–IN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10840-10841; text: CR S10840)
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10840-10841; text: CR S10840)
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S10427)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10427-10428)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.375 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.375 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.375 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.375 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.