S.Res.354 / 106th Congress

A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8425-8426; text as passed Senate: CR S8425-8426; text of measure as introduced: CR S8423)

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 12, 2000

Amends rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to increase the number of Senators on the: (1) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee from 18 to 20; (2) Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee from 18 to 22; and (3) Veterans' Affairs Committee from 12 to 14.Provides for majority party appointments to the following committees: (1) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; (2) Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; (3) Finance; (4) Small Business; and (5) Veterans' Affairs.Provides for minority party appointments to the following committees: (1) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; (2) Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; and (3) Veterans' Affairs.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Lott, Trent [R-MS] · R–MS

Committees

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 12, 2000
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8425-8426; text as passed Senate: CR S8425-8426; text of measure as introduced: CR S8423)
Sep 12, 2000
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8425-8426; text as passed Senate: CR S8425-8426; text of measure as introduced: CR S8423)
Sep 12, 2000
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Agreed to Senate · Sep 12, 2000 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 16, 2023. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.354 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.354, 106th Congress: A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-resolution/354

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2000-09-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/sres354/BILLS-106sres354ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2023-01-16T15:28:51Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Res.354 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.354 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.354, 106th Congress: A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-resolution/354

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2000-09-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/sres354/BILLS-106sres354ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2023-01-16T15:28:51Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.354 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.354 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.354, 106th Congress: A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-resolution/354

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2000-09-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/sres354/BILLS-106sres354ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2023-01-16T15:28:51Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.354 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.354 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.354, 106th Congress: A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-resolution/354

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2000-09-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/sres354/BILLS-106sres354ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2023-01-16T15:28:51Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.354 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.