PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.329 / 117th Congress

A resolution amending the eligibility criteria for the Senate Employee Child Care Center.

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5193; text: CR S5181)

Official summary

Version 55 · Passed Senate · Jul 29, 2021

This resolution revises the eligibility criteria for the Senate Employee Child Care Center.

For FY2022, and each fiscal year afterwards, the Senate shall reimburse the Senate Employee Child Care Center for the cost of the basic pay paid to the Executive Director and the Assistant Director of the center.

As a condition of receiving such reimbursement, the center must terminate the enrollment of a child at the center within 120 days of the date on which the child does not have a parent or guardian who is serving as an employee of the Senate, an employee of the center, a congressional employee, or a federal employee.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

As a condition of receiving reimbursement under this resolution, the center shall provide enrollment

first, to a child of an individual serving as a Senate employee or as an employee of the center;

second, to a child of an individual serving as a congressional employee; and

third, to a child of a federal employee if certain conditions are met.

Under the resolution, the center may provide enrollment to the child of a federal employee if

there is an enrollment slot available;

no child of an individual serving as an employee of the Senate, as an employee of the center, or as a congressional employee accepts the slot; and

no currently enrolled child is ready to transition to the class in which the slot is available.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN] · D–MN

Committees

    1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5193; text: CR S5181)

    2. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5193; text: CR S5181)

    3. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jan 1, 2023. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.Res.329 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.Res.329 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.Res.329 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.Res.329 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources