A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on United States efforts to encourage the governments of foreign countries to investigate and prosecute crimes committed in those countries in the name of family honor and to provide relief for victims of those crimes.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5686-5687)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 22, 2000
Calls for the President, through the U.S. Agency for International Development, to: (1) work with law enforcement and judicial agencies of foreign governments to encourage the adoption of legal system reforms that provide for the investigation and prosecution of honor crimes; and (2) make available to local organizations in foreign countries sufficient resources to provide refuge and rehabilitation for women who are victims of such crimes and to sustain their children. Calls for the Secretary of State, when preparing annual country reports on human rights practices, to include information relating to the incidence of honor violence in foreign countries, the steps taken to address such problem, and all relevant actions taken by the United States to reduce the incidence of such violence and to increase investigations and prosecutions of such crimes.Urges the President to: (1) communicate to the United Nations (UN) the concern over the high rate of honor-related violence toward women in foreign countries; and (2) request that the appropriate UN bodies propose actions to be taken to encourage those countries to end such violence. Calls on the President and the Secretary, through direct communication with leaders of countries where honor killings, dowry deaths, and related practices are endemic, to: (1) convey the most serious concerns of the United States about these gross violations of human rights; and (2) urge the leaders of those countries to investigate and prosecute as murders all such acts with a view to punishing the perpetrators to the maximum extent provided under law.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Res.327 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Res.327 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Res.327 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Res.327 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.