A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the continuing relationship between the United States and Georgia.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8673-8674)

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Dec 11, 2013

Supports the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Georgia and expresses concerns over the continued occupation of the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia by the Russian Federation.

Encourages the President to enhance U.S.-Georgia defense cooperation.

Supports Georgia's North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) membership aspirations.

Commends Georgia's determination to extend its Afghanistan mission beyond 2014.

Congratulates the government and people of Georgia on the Presidential election of October 27, 2013, and encourages the government to defend the rule of law, improve judicial independence, and protect the rights of political opposition.

Supports a U.S. and international election monitoring mission for this final phase of Georgia's election cycle.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Sessions, Jeff [R-AL] · R–AL

Committees

Foreign Relations Committee

7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Dec 11, 2013
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8673-8674)
Dec 11, 2013
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Dec 11, 2013 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.317 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.317, 113th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the continuing relationship between the United States and Georgia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/317

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2013-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/sres317/BILLS-113sres317is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:09:50Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Res.317 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.317 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.317, 113th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the continuing relationship between the United States and Georgia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/317

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2013-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/sres317/BILLS-113sres317is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:09:50Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.317 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.317 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.317, 113th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the continuing relationship between the United States and Georgia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/317

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2013-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/sres317/BILLS-113sres317is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:09:50Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.317 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.317 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.317, 113th Congress: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the continuing relationship between the United States and Georgia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/317

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2013-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/sres317/BILLS-113sres317is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:09:50Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.317 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.