A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the treatment by the Russian Federation of Andrei Babitsky, a Russian journalist working for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5759-5760; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5759; text as passed Senate: CR S5760)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 4, 2000
Calls for the Government of the Russian Federation to: (1) drop its charges against Andrei Babitsky, a Russian journalist working for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty; (2) provide a full accounting of Babitsky's detention; and (3) adhere fully to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Condemns the Russian Federation's harassment and intimidation of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and other news organizations.Urges the Government of the Russian Federation and the President to implement the recommendations in Senate Resolutions 223 and 262.Urges the President to place these issues high on the agenda for his June 4-5 summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5759-5760; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5759; text as passed Senate: CR S5760)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5759-5760; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5759; text as passed Senate: CR S5760)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 598.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3546-3547)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3547)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Res.303 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Res.303 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Res.303 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Res.303 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.