PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S240; text: CR S238)
Congressional Research Service
Version 55 · Passed Senate · Feb 2, 2023
This resolution designates the Senate majority party's membership for the 118th Congress on the following committees:
the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry;
the Committee on Appropriations;
the Committee on Armed Services;
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs;
the Committee on the Budget;
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation;
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources;
the Committee on the Environment and Public Works;
the Committee on Finance;
the Committee on Foreign Relations;
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions;
the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs;
the Committee on Indian Affairs;
the Committee on the Judiciary;
the Committee on Rules and Administration;
the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship;
the Committee on Veterans' Affairs;
the Joint Economic Committee;
the Select Committee on Ethics;
the Select Committee on Intelligence; and
the Special Committee on Aging.
People & committees
Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S240; text: CR S238)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S240; text: CR S238)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 17, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.30 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.30 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.30 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.30 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.