PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3605)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 20, 1999
Expresses the sense of the Senate that Taiwan and its 21 million people should have appropriate and meaningful participation in the World Health Organization (WHO), and that the Secretary of State should report to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by April 1, 1999, on: (1) the Secretary's efforts to more actively support Taiwan's membership in international organizations that accept non-states as members, and to look for ways to have Taiwan's voice heard in international organizations; and (2) what action the United States will take at the May 1999 WHO meeting in Geneva to support Taiwan's meaningful participation.
People & committees
Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK] · R–AK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3605)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with amendments and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S3605)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 85.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms under the authority of the order of Mar 25, 99 with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Helms under the authority of the order of Mar 25, 99 with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.26 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.26 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.26 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.26 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.