PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.251 / 103rd Congress

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding human rights violations in Kashmir and calling for a negotiated settlement to the Kashmir conflict, including India, Pakistan and the people of Kashmir.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 22, 1994

Condemns the use of coercive forces by Indian military and paramilitary forces against civilians in Kashmir and denounces any acts of violence by the Kashmiri militants. Urges the Government of India to release political prisoners, open Kashmir to international human rights groups and electronic media, permit the International Red Cross to visit prisons and detention centers, and prosecute security personnel involved in wanton violence against the civilian population. Reiterates the need for the Governments of India and Pakistan and the legitimate representatives of Kashmir to enter into negotiations and peacefully resolve the conflict. Urges the Administration to work with the United Nations and the international community to facilitate a peaceful negotiation for the final settlement of the Kashmir crisis.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Wallop, Malcolm [R-WY] · R–WY

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

    2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S12290)

    3. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.Res.251 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.Res.251 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.Res.251 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.Res.251 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources