S.Res.23 / 116th Congress

A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2456-2458; text: CR S2457-2458)

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 25 · Reported to Senate · Apr 4, 2019

This resolution recognizes the Senate's observation of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month in April 2019. It also urges the United States to lead in raising awareness about the devastating impact of international child abduction.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC] · R–NC

Committees

Foreign Relations Committee

12 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Apr 11, 2019
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2456-2458; text: CR S2457-2458)
Apr 11, 2019
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S2456-2458; text: CR S2457-2458)
Apr 4, 2019
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 56.
Apr 4, 2019
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch without amendment and with an amended preamble. Without written report.
Apr 4, 2019
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch without amendment and with an amended preamble. Without written report.
Apr 3, 2019
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
Jan 17, 2019
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Jan 17, 2019
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Agreed to Senate · Apr 11, 2019 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Reported to Senate · Apr 4, 2019 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Introduced in Senate · Jan 17, 2019 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

SRES 487 · A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Source last updated: Dec 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.23 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.23, 116th Congress: A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/23

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2019-04-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres23/BILLS-116sres23ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-06T16:29:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Res.23 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.23 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.23, 116th Congress: A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/23

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2019-04-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres23/BILLS-116sres23ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-06T16:29:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.23 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.23 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.23, 116th Congress: A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/23

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2019-04-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres23/BILLS-116sres23ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-06T16:29:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.23 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.23 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.23, 116th Congress: A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Countering International Parental Child Abduction Month and expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should raise awareness of the harm caused by international parental child abduction.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/23

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2019-04-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres23/BILLS-116sres23ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-06T16:29:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.23 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.