PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S368)
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Jan 31, 2011
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Condemns the New Year's Day 2011 attack on the Saint George and Bishop Peter Church in Alexandria, Egypt.
Expresses the Senate's condolences to the Coptic Christian community.
Calls on President Hosni Mubarak and the government of Egypt to: (1) fully investigate the bomb attack and prosecute the perpetrators, and (2) enhance security for the Coptic Christian community and ensure religious freedom and equality for all people in Egypt.
Calls on the President to work with the government of Egypt to identify the perpetrators of the New Year's Day attack.
Calls on the Secretary of State to address the issues of religious freedom and equality of treatment for all people in Egypt with the government of Egypt.
People & committees
Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S368)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S368)
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S368)
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S368)
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S245)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.22 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.22 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.22 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.22 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.