PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S9317)
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Jul 28, 2005
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Commemorates the 25th anniversary of the National Citizens' Crime Prevention Campaign. Asks the people of the United States to join in the celebration of the Campaign, its icon (McGruff the Crime Dog), and its managing organization (the National Crime Prevention Council). Encourages the Council and the Crime Prevention Coalition of America to continue to promote individual and collective action, in collaboration with law enforcement and other supporting agencies, to reduce crime and build safer communities.
People & committees
Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S9317)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S9317)
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9317)
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9317)
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8831)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8831)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.208 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.208 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.208 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.208 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.