A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should work to achieve a clearly defined and enforceable agreement with allies of the United States which establishes a multilateral export control regime to stem the proliferation of products and technologies to rogue regimes that would jeopardize the national security of the United States.
Referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 15, 1994
Expresses the sense of the Senate that the President should: (1) work to achieve an enforceable agreement with U.S. allies which establishes a multilateral export control system for the proliferation of products and technologies to rogue regimes that threaten U.S. national security; and (2) persuade such allies to promote mutual security interests by preventing such regimes from obtaining militarily critical products and technologies.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Res.190 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Res.190 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Res.190 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Res.190 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.