A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning the expeditious resolution of the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium between the United States and Russia.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 22, 1993

Declares that it is imperative that the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium by Russia be promptly resolved. Requires the Clinton administration's steering group on policy toward the new independent States to: (1) immediately conduct a nuclear policy review of the United States-Russia agreement on sales of commercial grade uranium to recommend administrative methods and procedures for achieving access to U.S. markets for Russian commercial grade uranium in a manner that is consistent with U.S. trade law; and (2) propose recommendations for expeditiously resolving the dispute through government-to-government agreements in the context of the United States-Russia summit in January 1994. Requires the President to report to appropriate committees of the Congress on the review and recommendations of the policy steering group review, within 90 days of enactment of this Act if the dispute remains unresolved.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Brown, Hank [R-CO] · R–CO

Committees

Foreign Relations Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Nov 22, 1993
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Nov 22, 1993
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S16956)
Nov 22, 1993
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Nov 22, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.174 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.174, 103rd Congress: A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning the expeditious resolution of the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium between the United States and Russia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-resolution/174

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1993-11-22.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/sres174/BILLS-103sres174is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:02:31Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Res.174 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.174 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.174, 103rd Congress: A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning the expeditious resolution of the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium between the United States and Russia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-resolution/174

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1993-11-22.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/sres174/BILLS-103sres174is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:02:31Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.174 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.174 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.174, 103rd Congress: A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning the expeditious resolution of the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium between the United States and Russia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-resolution/174

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1993-11-22.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/sres174/BILLS-103sres174is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:02:31Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.174 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.174 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Res.174, 103rd Congress: A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning the expeditious resolution of the dispute concerning sales of commercial grade uranium between the United States and Russia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-resolution/174

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1993-11-22.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/sres174/BILLS-103sres174is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:02:31Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Res.174 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.