PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.165 / 103rd Congress

A resolution to state the sense of the Senate with respect to the compliance of Libya with United Nations Security Council Resolutions.

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 16, 1993

Expresses the sense of the Senate that the President should take all appropriate actions necessary to secure the compliance of the Government of Libya with United Nations Security Council Resolution 731 (regarding the bombing of Pan American Airways Flight 103), including, if necessary, the imposition of an embargo on oil produced in Libya.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA] · D–MA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.

  2. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S16644-16645)

  4. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 303.

  5. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Pell without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  6. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Pell without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  7. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  8. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  9. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.165 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.165 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.165 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.165 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources