A resolution to express the sense of the Senate regarding positive consideration of crime fighting activities by financial institutions under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.
Referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 10, 1993
Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) the Federal financial institution regulatory agencies, in any effort to reform regulations implementing the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (the Act), should consider giving financial institutions credit for providing credit and investments which may assist in fighting the causes of violence and in preventing crime in their communities, including loans to police officers and firefighters who establish their residences in high crime neighborhoods, loans for community recreation facilities in such neighborhoods, and loans for job creating activities for youths or adults who might otherwise become involved in crime; (2) regulations promulgated or amended under the Act should give positive consideration to investments made by financial institutions in other financial intermediaries which have the effect of stabilizing neighborhoods and fighting the causes of violence and preventing crime in those neighborhoods; (3) loans and investments extended by a financial institution for the purpose of fighting the causes of violence and preventing crime outside of its normal lending area or geographic community should be considered legitimate community reinvestment activities; and (4) reformed regulations under the Act should not define a financial institution's "local community" so narrowly that loans and investments provided to fight the causes of violence and help prevent crime will not be positively considered under the Act simply because they are extended outside the area normally delineated by the institution as its "local community."
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Res.163 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Res.163 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Res.163 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Res.163 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.