PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Res.136 / 108th Congress

A resolution recognizing the 140th anniversary of the founding of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and congratulating members and officers of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers for the union's many achievements.

Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 8, 2003

Recognizes the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, on its 140th anniversary, for its contribution to the structural development and building of the United States and to the well-being of tens of thousands of workers.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA] · D–MA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  2. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  3. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7197)

  4. Senate vitiated previous passage.

  5. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7171; text as passed Senate: CR S7171)

  6. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S7171; text as passed Senate: CR S7171)

  7. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 110.

  8. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Hatch without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  9. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Hatch without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  10. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  11. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5973)

  12. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Res.136 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Res.136 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Res.136 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Res.136 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources