PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Committee on Finance.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 4, 1995
Calls for the President to: (1) expand the free trade agreement between the United States and Israel to include those countries that sustain a "warm" peace with Israel; (2) prior to such expansion, and annually thereafter, certify to the Congress that such countries have entered into a "warm" peace with Israel that includes the recognition of and establishment of full diplomatic relations with Israel, eliminating all levels of the Arab boycott of Israel, a commitment to a quick response to condemn and punish acts of international terrorism, working closely with the United States and Israel to remove havens for international terrorists, mutual security agreements with Israel, extradition agreements with Israel on reciprocal treatment of terrorists, and agreements with Israel which ensure the mutual reduction of barriers to the free flow of goods and people; and (3) not extend any preferences or trade inducements to a country that is a state-sponsor of terrorism.
People & committees
Sen. Brown, Hank [R-CO] · R–CO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Res.101 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Res.101 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Res.101 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Res.101 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.