PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 103-30.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 16, 1993
Designates the weeks beginning April 18, 1993, and April 17, 1994, as National Organ and Tissue Donor Awareness Week.
People & committees
Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC] · R–SC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 103-30.
Became Public Law No: 103-30.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S4868)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S4868)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H1948)
Proceedings on the passage of S.J. Res. 66 were vacated. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Wynn asked unanimous consent to vacate previous passage of the bill and consider.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
Mr. Wynn asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H1926-1927)
Held at the desk.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.
Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S4553)
Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S4553)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2954)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.J.Res.66 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.J.Res.66 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.J.Res.66 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.J.Res.66 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.