PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-186.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 28, 2000
Expresses the sense of the Congress that the President of the United States should convey to the President of Peru that if the April 9, 2000, elections are not deemed by the international community to have been free and fair, the United States will modify its political and economic relations with Peru, including its support for international financial institution loans to Peru, and will work with other democracies toward a restoration of democracy in Peru.
People & committees
Sen. Coverdell, Paul [R-GA] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-186.
Became Public Law No: 106-186.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H2090)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H2090)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H2089-2090)
Mr. Gilman asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on International Relations discharged.
Committee on International Relations discharged.
Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Voice Vote. (text: CR S2444)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Voice Vote.(text: CR S2444)
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2444)
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 478.
Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1826)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1825-1826)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.J.Res.43 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.J.Res.43 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.J.Res.43 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.J.Res.43 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.