PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.J.Res.36 / 113th Congress

A joint resolution relating to the approval and implementation of the proposed agreement for nuclear cooperation between the United States and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jul 29, 2014

States that: (1) Congress favors the Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, signed on May 6, 2014; and (2) such Agreement becomes effective in accordance with this joint resolution and other applicable law.

Prohibits issuance of any export license pursuant to a civil nuclear cooperation agreement 30 years after the agreement's entry into force unless:

(1) the President, within the agreement's final five years, has certified to Congress that the party to such agreement has continued to fulfill its terms and conditions and that the agreement continues to be in the interest of the United States; and (2) Congress enacts a joint resolution permitting the continuation of the agreement for an additional period of not more than 30 years.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Exempts from such restriction:

any agreement that had entered into force as of August 1, 2014,

any agreement with the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States (TECRO) or the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), or

any amendment to any such agreement.

States that the Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statement required to be submitted by the Secretary State to the President shall also be submitted to Congress and shall be accompanied by a classified annex identifying all classified information related to the agreement to which such Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statement applies, and shall include the following:

an assessment of the proposed agreement for cooperation;

an assessment of the adequacy of safeguards and other control mechanisms and the peaceful use assurances contained in the agreement for cooperation;

a historical assessment of past proliferation activity of the cooperating party;

a list of all the treaties and agreements related to non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction to which the cooperating party is also a party;

an assessment of the cooperating party's national laws that govern the non-proliferation of materials or equipment related to weapons of mass destruction;

an explanation for the negotiated duration of the agreement;

a comparison of the agreement to other existing civil nuclear cooperation agreements between the United States and other states in the region;

an assessment of the strategic, security, stability, and regional considerations throughout the negotiation of this agreement; and

an assessment of the physical and environmental security of the waste-cycle.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
  • Foreign Relations Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  2. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  3. Received in the House.

  4. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR 8/1/2014 S5312-5313; text as passed Senate: CR 8/1/2014 S5312-5313)

  5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR 8/1/2014 S5312-5313; text as passed Senate: CR 8/1/2014 S5312-5313)

  6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 494.

  7. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Menendez with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 113-221.

  8. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Menendez with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 113-221.

  9. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  11. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.J.Res.36 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.J.Res.36 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.J.Res.36 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.J.Res.36 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources