PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.J.Res.28 / 108th Congress

A joint resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy during World War II.

Became Public Law No: 108-236.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jun 15, 2004

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Recognizes the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy, France, during World War II on June 6, 1944.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · R–CO

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
69 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-236.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-236.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 419 - 0 (Roll no. 220). (text: CR 6/1/2004 H3553)

    House roll call 220 · Individual votes
  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 419 - 0 (Roll no. 220).(text: CR 6/1/2004 H3553)

    House roll call 220 · Individual votes
  10. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3682)

  11. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S.J. Res. 28.

  13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3553-3555)

  14. Mr. Ryun (KS) moved to suspend the rules and pass the resolution.

  15. Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

  16. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  17. Received in the House.

  18. Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S3595)

  19. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S3595)

  20. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3595)

  21. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S3595)

  22. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1599)

  23. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.J.Res.28 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.J.Res.28 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.J.Res.28 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.J.Res.28 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources