A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

S.J.Res.27 through Congress

S.J.Res.27 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

SenateDec 11, 2007IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No House action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related House measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the House stage of S.J.Res.27.

Related House measure: H.J.Res.38 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to authorize the line item veto.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Dec 11, 2007

Constitutional Amendment - Authorizes the President to make a line item veto of any appropriation in any bill, order, resolution, or vote presented for signature into law.

Declares that any legislation the President approves and signs, after being amended with a line item veto, shall become law as so modified.

Requires the President to return those portions of the legislation that contain reduced or disapproved appropriations, with objections, to the House where such legislation originated.

Authorizes Congress to separately consider any reduced or disapproved appropriations in the manner prescribed under section 7 of Article I for vetoed bills.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Dole, Elizabeth [R-NC] · R–NC

Committees

Judiciary Committee

7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Dec 11, 2007
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Dec 11, 2007
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Dec 11, 2007 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HJRES 38 · Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to authorize the line item veto.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.J.Res.27 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.J.Res.27, 110th Congress: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/27

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2007-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/sjres27/BILLS-110sjres27is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:53:29Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.J.Res.27 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.J.Res.27, 110th Congress: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/27

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2007-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/sjres27/BILLS-110sjres27is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:53:29Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.J.Res.27, 110th Congress: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/27

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2007-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/sjres27/BILLS-110sjres27is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:53:29Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.J.Res.27, 110th Congress: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the line item veto.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/27

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2007-12-11.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/sjres27/BILLS-110sjres27is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:53:29Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.J.Res.27 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.