PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.J.Res.22 / 107th Congress

A joint resolution expressing the sense of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the terrorist attacks launched against the Unites States on September 11, 2001.

Became Public Law No: 107-39.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 12, 2001

Condemns the terrorists who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, as well as their sponsors.Extends condolences to the victims and their families and commends the heroic actions of the rescue workers, volunteers, and State and local officials who responded.Declares that the United States is entitled under international law to respond to these attacks.Expresses: (1) thanks to those foreign leaders and individuals who have expressed solidarity with the United States in the aftermath of the attacks and asks them to continue to stand with the United States in the war against international terrorism; (2) a commitment to support increased resources in the war to eradicate terrorism; and (3) support for the determination of the President to bring to justice and punish the perpetrators of these attacks and their sponsors.Declares September 12, 2001, to be a National Day of Unity and Mourning.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD] · D–SD

Committees

    99 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 107-39.

    2. Became Public Law No: 107-39.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On passage Passed without objection.

    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

    10. Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

    11. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H5590)

    12. Received in the House.

    13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    14. Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Yea-Nay Vote. 100 - 0. Record Vote Number: 277. (consideration: CR S9284-9288, S9289-9332; text as passed Senate: CR S9284; text of measure as introduced: CR S9340)

      Senate roll call 277 · Individual votes
    15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Yea-Nay Vote. 100 - 0. Record Vote Number: 277.(consideration: CR S9284-9288, S9289-9332; text as passed Senate: CR S9284; text of measure as introduced: CR S9340)

      Senate roll call 277 · Individual votes
    16. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.J.Res.22 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.J.Res.22 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.J.Res.22 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.J.Res.22 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources