PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-209.
Congressional Research Service
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 19, 2002
Proclaims posthumously Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roche Gilbert du Motier (the Marquis de Lafayette) to be an honorary citizen of the United States.
People & committees
Sen. Warner, John [R-VA] · R–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-209.
Became Public Law No: 107-209.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate concurred in House amendment, preamble amendment and amendment to the title by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7302-7303; text as Senate agreed to House amendments: CR S7302)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate concurred in House amendment, preamble amendment and amendment to the title by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S7302-7303; text as Senate agreed to House amendments: CR S7302)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4992)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H4992)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate S.J. Res. 13.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4992-4994)
Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to suspend the rules and pass the resolution, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 357.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-595.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-595.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S13642-13643; text as passed Senate: CR S13643)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S13642-13643; text as passed Senate: CR S13643)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 286.
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Star Print ordered on the joint resolution.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3864)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3864)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.J.Res.13 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.J.Res.13 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.J.Res.13 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.J.Res.13 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.