PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.J.Res.12 / 109th Congress

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 34. Record Vote Number: 189.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jun 20, 2006

Constitutional Amendment - Grants Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the U.S. flag.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
59 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 34. Record Vote Number: 189.

    Senate roll call 189 · Individual votes
  2. Failed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 34. Record Vote Number: 189.

    Senate roll call 189 · Individual votes
  3. The committee amendment was agreed to by Unanimous Consent.

  4. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6503-6515, S6515-6547)

  5. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6471-6487; text as reported in Senate: CR S6471)

  6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 473.

  7. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Specter with an amendment. Without written report.

  8. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Specter with an amendment. Without written report.

  9. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  10. Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights. Approved for full committee consideration without amendment favorably.

  11. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  12. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3686-3687)

  13. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.J.Res.12 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.J.Res.12 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.J.Res.12 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.J.Res.12 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources