A concurrent resolution providing for conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 29, 2002

Provides for a recess or an adjournment of the Senate from January 29, 2002, until February 4, 2002, and for an adjournment of the House of Representatives from January 29, 2002, until February 4, 2002.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD] · D–SD

Committees

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Sen. Lott, Trent [R-MS]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jan 29, 2002
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jan 29, 2002
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.
Jan 29, 2002
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.
Jan 29, 2002
Considered as privileged matter.
Jan 29, 2002
Received in the House.
Jan 29, 2002
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Jan 29, 2002
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S206; text as passed Senate: CR S206; text of measure as introduced: CR S239)
Jan 29, 2002
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S206; text as passed Senate: CR S206; text of measure as introduced: CR S239)
Jan 29, 2002
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Enrolled Bill · Not supplied Formatted Text PDF
Agreed to Senate · Jan 29, 2002 Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed in Senate · Jan 29, 2002 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Con.Res.95 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.95, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution providing for conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/95

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2002-01-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres95/BILLS-107sconres95ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:37:09Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Con.Res.95 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.95, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution providing for conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/95

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2002-01-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres95/BILLS-107sconres95ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:37:09Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.95, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution providing for conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/95

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2002-01-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres95/BILLS-107sconres95ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:37:09Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.95, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution providing for conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/95

Text version to examine: Agreed to Senate · 2002-01-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres95/BILLS-107sconres95ats.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:37:09Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.95 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.