A concurrent resolution honoring the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency rescue personnel, and health care professionals who have worked tirelessly to search for and rescue the victims of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 4, 2001

Commends the firefighters, police officers, rescue personnel, health care professionals who have dedicated themselves to the search, rescue, and recovery efforts in New York City, northern Virginia, and Pennsylvania and law enforcement and public safety personnel throughout the Nation for their service in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Feingold, Russell D. [D-WI] · D–WI

Committees

Oversight and Government Reform Committee
Judiciary Committee

4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 10, 2001
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Oct 10, 2001
Received in the House.
Oct 10, 2001
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Oct 9, 2001
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S10401)
Oct 9, 2001
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S10401)
Oct 9, 2001
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10400-10401)
Oct 9, 2001
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10400-10401)
Oct 4, 2001
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S10336)
Oct 4, 2001
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Referred in House · Oct 10, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed in Senate · Oct 9, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in Senate · Oct 4, 2001 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Con.Res.76 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.76, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution honoring the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency rescue personnel, and health care professionals who have worked tirelessly to search for and rescue the victims of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/76

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-10-10.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres76/BILLS-107sconres76rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:52:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.Con.Res.76 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.76, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution honoring the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency rescue personnel, and health care professionals who have worked tirelessly to search for and rescue the victims of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/76

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-10-10.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres76/BILLS-107sconres76rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:52:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.76, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution honoring the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency rescue personnel, and health care professionals who have worked tirelessly to search for and rescue the victims of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/76

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-10-10.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres76/BILLS-107sconres76rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:52:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.Con.Res.76, 107th Congress: A concurrent resolution honoring the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency rescue personnel, and health care professionals who have worked tirelessly to search for and rescue the victims of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/76

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-10-10.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/sconres76/BILLS-107sconres76rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-08-10T11:52:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.Con.Res.76 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.