A concurrent resolution correcting the enrollment of H.R. 2863.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Dec 22, 2005
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Directs the Clerk of the House of the Representatives to make corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 2863 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006) by striking Division C, the American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2005 (allowing oil well drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)) and Division D, the Distribution of Revenues and Disaster Assistance.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H13183)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H13183)
RESERVATION OF OBJECTION - Mr. Fitzpatrick raised the right to object to the consideration of S. Con. Res. 74. Mr. Fitzpatrick later withdrew his objection.
RESERVATION OF OBJECTION - Mr. Obey raised the right to object to the consideration of S. Con. Res. 74. Mr. Obey later withdrew his objection.
Mr. Wolf asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider. (consideration: CR H13181-13183)
Received in the House.
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 45. Record Vote Number: 365. (consideration: CR S14233-14240; text as passed Senate: CR S14240; text of measure as introduced: CR 12/22/2005 S14337)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 45. Record Vote Number: 365.(consideration: CR S14233-14240; text as passed Senate: CR S14240; text of measure as introduced: CR 12/22/2005 S14337)
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Con.Res.74 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Con.Res.74 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Con.Res.74 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Con.Res.74 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.