PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Jul 24, 2006
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on April 3, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Designates the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum in Kansas City, Missouri, as America's National Negro Leagues Baseball Museum.
Expresses support for the Museum's efforts to recognize and preserve the history of the Negro Leagues and the impact of segregation on our nation.
Commends the ongoing development and visibility of the Power Alley educational outreach program for teachers and students sponsored by the Museum.
Encourages present and future generations to understand the sensitive issues surrounding the Negro Leagues, how they helped shape our nation and Major League Baseball, and how the sacrifices made by the players helped make baseball America's national pastime.
People & committees
Sen. Talent, Jim [R-MO] · R–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5587)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5587)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. Con. Res. 60.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5587)
Mr. Walden (OR) moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2846-2847; text as reported in Senate: CR S2846; text as passed Senate: CR S2846-2847)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S2846-2847; text as reported in Senate: CR S2846; text as passed Senate: CR S2846-2847)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 387.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with an amendment and with an amended preamble. With written report No. 109-228.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with an amendment and with an amended preamble. With written report No. 109-228.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 109-355.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S11828)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Con.Res.60 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Con.Res.60 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Con.Res.60 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Con.Res.60 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.