PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Con.Res.51 / 104th Congress

A concurrent resolution to provide for the approval of final regulations that are applicable to employing offices that are not employing offices of the House of Representatives or the Senate, and to covered employees who are not employees of the House of Representatives or the Senate, and that were issued by the Office of Compliance on January 22, 1996, and for other purposes.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 15, 1996

Approves specified regulations issued by the Office of Compliance on January 22, 1996, that are applicable to employing offices that are not the House of Representatives or the Senate and to covered employees who are not House or Senate employees in accordance with the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 with respect to rights and protections under: (1) the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993; (2) the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; (3) the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988; and (4) the Worker Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1988.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Warner, John [R-VA] · R–VA

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

      2. On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

      3. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

      4. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

      5. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR 4/15/1996 H3343-3384)

      6. Mr. Thomas moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

      7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

      8. Held at the desk.

      9. Received in the House.

      10. Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3327)

      11. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S3327)

      12. Introduced in Senate

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

      Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze S.Con.Res.51 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine S.Con.Res.51 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine S.Con.Res.51 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine S.Con.Res.51 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources