PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
S.Con.Res.46 / 114th Congress

A concurrent resolution expressing support for the goal of ensuring that all Holocaust victims live with dignity, comfort, and security in their remaining years, and urging the Federal Republic of Germany to continue to reaffirm its commitment to comprehensively address the unique health and welfare needs of vulnerable Holocaust victims, including home care and other medically prescribed needs.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official summary

Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Sep 12, 2016

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Acknowledges the financial and moral commitment of the Federal Republic of Germany over the past seven decades to provide a measure of justice for Holocaust victims.

Expresses support for the goal of ensuring that all Holocaust victims are able to live with dignity, comfort, and security.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Nelson, Bill [D-FL] · D–FL

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
  • Foreign Relations Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  2. On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5263)

  3. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5263)

  4. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. Con. Res. 46.

  5. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5263-5266)

  6. Mr. Royce moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

  7. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  8. Received in the House.

  9. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  10. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5187)

  11. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5187)

  12. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 568.

  13. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  14. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

  15. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  16. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5009-5010)

  17. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.Con.Res.46 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.Con.Res.46 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.Con.Res.46 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.Con.Res.46 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources