PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.An objection was heard to the unanimous consent request to consider the measure.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jul 17, 1995
Requires the Architect of the Capitol to: (1) restore the Portrait Monument (a statue of Lucretia Mott, Susan B. Anthony, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton) to its original state and place it in the rotunda of the Capitol; and (2) make arrangements for the rededication ceremony of such statue in the rotunda and connected procession in cooperation with the 75th Anniversary of Woman Suffrage Task Force. Authorizes the use of the rotunda on August 26, 1995, for the ceremony.
People & committees
Sen. Stevens, Ted [R-AK] · R–AK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
An objection was heard to the unanimous consent request to consider the measure.
Ms. Dunn asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Referred to the House Committee on House Oversight.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S10166-10167)
Submitted in the Senate and held at the desk by unanimous consent. Until the close of business July 17, 1995.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10011)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Con.Res.21 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Con.Res.21 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Con.Res.21 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Con.Res.21 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.