A concurrent resolution permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to commemorate the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 3, 1993
Allows use of the rotunda of the Capitol on April 20, 1993, and April 6, 1994, for ceremonies to observe the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.
Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3951-3952)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S3951-3952)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The title of the measure was amended to that of similar measure H. Con. Res. 41. Agreed to without objection.
A similar measure H. Con. Res. 41 was laid on the table without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.
The House struck all after the enacting clause and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of a similar measure H. Con. Res. 41. Agreed to without objection.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H1543-1544)
Mr. Frost asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3275)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S3275)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 39.
Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Ford without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Ford without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.
Committee on Rules. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Referred to the Committee on Rules.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2362)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.Con.Res.13 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.Con.Res.13 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.Con.Res.13 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.Con.Res.13 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.