PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Sep 13, 2006
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Directs the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the enrollment of S. 2590 (Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006) by: (1) modifying the requirement that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by January 1, 2008, ensure the existence and operation of a single searchable website for federal awards to require that it do so in accordance with the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act; (2) requiring that the website provide for separate searches that distinguish between awards that are grants, subgrants, loans, cooperative agreements, and other forms of financial assistance and awards that are contracts, subcontracts, purchase orders, task orders, and delivery orders; and (3) requiring the Comptroller General to report to Congress by January 1, 2010, on compliance with that Act.
People & committees
Sen. Coburn, Tom [R-OK] · R–OK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H6501-6502)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H6501-6502)
Mr. Davis, Tom asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H6501-6502)
Held at the desk.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9563-9564; text as passed Senate: CR S9563-9564; text of measure as introduced: CR S9507)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9563-9564; text as passed Senate: CR S9563-9564; text of measure as introduced: CR S9507)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.Con.Res.114 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.Con.Res.114 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.Con.Res.114 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.Con.Res.114 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.