PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015

By Senator Hatch from Committee on Finance filed written report. Report No. 114-42. Additional and Minority views filed.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · May 11, 2015

Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015

(Sec. 2) Declares the overall trade negotiating objectives of the United States with respect to any agreement with a foreign country to reduce or eliminate existing tariffs or nontariff barriers of that country or the United States that are unduly burdening and restricting U.S. trade. Includes among such objectives:

more open, equitable, and reciprocal market access;

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

the reduction or elimination of trade barriers and distortions that are directly related to trade and investment and that decrease market opportunities for U.S. exports or otherwise distort U.S. trade;

stronger international trade and investment disciplines and procedures, including dispute settlement;

enhanced U.S. competitiveness;

protection of the environment;

respect for worker and children rights consistent with International Labor Organization core labor standards; and

equal access of small businesses to international markets.

Declares the principal trade negotiating objectives of the United States with respect to:

goods and services;

agriculture;

foreign investment;

intellectual property;

digital goods and services, as well as cross-border data flows;

regulatory practices;

state-owned and state-controlled enterprises;

localization barriers to trade;

labor and the environment;

currency;

the World Trade Organization (WTO) and multilateral trade agreements;

trade institution transparency;

anti-corruption;

dispute settlement and enforcement;

trade remedy laws;

border taxes;

textile negotiations;

commercial partnerships, especially with Israel; and

good governance, transparency, operation of legal regimes, and the rule of law of U.S. trading partners.

Directs the President, in order to maintain U.S. competitiveness in the global economy, to engage in specified capacity building activities with respect to foreign countries that seek to enter into trade agreements with the United States.

(Sec. 3) Authorizes the President to enter into trade agreements with foreign countries for the reduction or elimination of tariff or nontariff barriers before July 1, 2018, or before July 1, 2021, if trade authorities procedures are extended to implementing bills (congressional approval) with respect to such agreements.

Authorizes the President to proclaim necessary or appropriate modifications or continuation of any existing duty, continuation of existing duty-free or excise treatment, or additional duties to carry out any such agreement.

(Sec. 4) Subjects trade agreements to congressional oversight and approval, consultations, and access to information requirements.

Requires the convening each Congress of the House and the Senate Advisory Groups on Negotiations to consult with and advise the United States Trade Representative (USTR) regarding the formulation of specific objectives, negotiating strategies and positions, the development of the applicable trade agreement, and compliance and enforcement of the negotiated commitments under the trade agreement.

Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to establish within the Office of the USTR the position of Chief Transparency Officer to consult with Congress on transparency policy, coordinate transparency in trade negotiations, engage and assist the public, and advise the USTR on transparency policy.

(Sec. 5) Specifies presidential notifications, consultations, reports, and other actions and their deadlines that must take place for any trade agreement to enter into force.

Specifies requirements for negotiations regarding agriculture, the fishing industry, and textiles.

(Sec. 6) Prescribes procedures for resolutions of disapproval in the House and the Senate before the President enters into any trade agreement.

Declares that trade authorities procedures shall not apply to any implementing bill submitted with respect to a trade agreement:

if both chambers of Congress agree by a certain deadline to a procedural disapproval resolution for lack of notice or consultations, and

with a country which does not fully comply and is not making significant efforts to comply with minimum standards for the elimination of human trafficking ("tier 3" country). (Sec. 7) Prescribes requirements for the treatment of trade agreements entered into under the auspices of the WTO or with the Trans-Pacific Partnership countries or the European Union which result from negotiations commenced before enactment of this Act.

(Sec. 8) Declares that any provision of a trade agreement that is inconsistent with any U.S. laws shall be null and void.

(Sec. 9) Expresses the sense of Congress that the USTR should facilitate participation of small businesses in the trade negotiation process.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT

Committees

  • Finance Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. By Senator Hatch from Committee on Finance filed written report. Report No. 114-42. Additional and Minority views filed.

  2. By Senator Hatch from Committee on Finance filed written report. Report No. 114-42. Additional and Minority views filed.

  3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 73.

  4. Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Hatch with amendments. Without written report.

  5. Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Hatch with amendments. Without written report.

  6. Committee on Finance. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  7. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

  8. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.995 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.995 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.995 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.995 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources