PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

I-27 Numbering Act of 2023

Became Public Law No: 118-45.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 4, 2023

I–27 Numbering Act of 2023

This bill designates the future interstate highway system portions of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor within the states of Texas and New Mexico as Interstate Route I–27.

In Texas, from Sterling City to Lamesa, U.S. Route 87 is designated as Interstate Route I–27E and Texas Routes 158 and 349 via I–20 are designated as Interstate Route I–27W. The bill also excludes one portion of the Texas and New Mexico corridor; U.S. Route 287 from Dumas, Texas to the border between Texas and Oklahoma is designated as Interstate Route I–127N.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX] · R–TX

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 118-45.

  2. Became Public Law No: 118-45.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to House amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6085)

  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6085)

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 992.

  15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6085-6086)

  16. Mr. Kean (NJ) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  17. Held at the desk.

  18. Received in the House.

  19. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  20. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S3844)

  21. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S3844)

  22. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S3844)

  23. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  24. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  25. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  26. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.992 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.992 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.992 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.992 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources