PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to amend title II of the Hydrogen Future Act of 1996 to extend an authorization contained therein, and for other purposes.

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 26, 1997

Amends the Hydrogen Future Act of 1996 to extend from FY 1999 through FY 2002 the authorization of appropriations for projects to prove the feasibility of integrating fuel cells with hydrogen production systems.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK] · R–AK

Committees

  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Science.

    4. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    5. Received in the House.

    6. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9435)

    7. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9435)

    8. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 151.

    9. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 105-69.

    10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 105-69.

    11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    12. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    13. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6498-6499)

    14. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.965 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.965 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.965 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.965 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources