PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to designate the United States Courthouse for the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria, Virginia, as the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse.

Became Public Law No: 104-86.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 26, 1995

Designates the United States Courthouse for the Eastern District of Virginia, located at Courthouse Square South and Jamieson Avenue in Alexandria, Virginia, as the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse. Provides that the Federal building located at 200 South Washington Street in Alexandria, Virginia, shall no longer be so designated.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Warner, John [R-VA] · R–VA

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-86.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-86.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    10. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H14984-14985)

    11. Mr. Gilchrest moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    12. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 163.

    13. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 104-420.

    14. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 104-420.

    15. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    16. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    17. Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Economic Development Discharged.

    18. Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Economic Development.

    19. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation.

    20. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    21. Received in the House.

    22. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S12110)

    23. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S12110)

    24. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 172.

    25. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. Without written report.

    26. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. Without written report.

    27. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    28. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    29. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9097-9098)

    30. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.965 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.965 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.965 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.965 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources