PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Maritime Administration Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 220.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jul 20, 1999

Maritime Administration Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 - Authorizes appropriations for the Maritime Administration for: (1) operations and training; and (2) the costs of guaranteed loans authorized by the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as well as for administrative expenses related to loan guarantee commitments.(Sec. 3) Amends the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 to revise loan guarantee escrow fund provisions. Establishes a Treasury fund to hold related collateral.(Sec. 4) Exempts certain dry bulk and breakbulk cargo vessels constructed, reconstructed, or acquired in a foreign shipyard that have transferred to United States flag registry from the three-year restriction on carrying U.S.-procured, furnished, or financially supported cargo (including agricultural cargo).(Sec. 5) Extends war risk insurance authority.(Sec. 6) Reduces specified Maritime Administration reporting requirements.(Sec. 7) Amends Federal law to list one of three specified vessels that may be exempted from provisions relating to inspection and regulation of vessels as belonging to the National Liberty Ship Memorial, Inc., rather than to the Maritime Administration.(Sec. 8) Mandates the Maritime Administration to conduct and report to Congress on a study of maritime research and technology development. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hutchison, Kay Bailey [R-TX] · R–TX

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 220.

  2. Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator McCain with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 106-111.

  3. Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator McCain with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 106-111.

  4. Committee on Commerce. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  6. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4579-4580)

  7. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.937 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.937 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.937 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.937 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources